Ten Lies and Ten Truths (Second Edition) Read online

  Sam clasped the back of his chair with both hands, ignoring her chides. "I'm telling you that this documentary is going to air just like we planned it and just like you taped it. We can't just show up two hundred years later and doubt evolution. Can you imagine what that would mean? We'd have to question just about every theory we have if evolution isn't true, and I'm not about to stick my neck out to prove that Pamela Stevens knows more than Charles Darwin. Do you think we'd ever get a decent job in television again? We'd be finished, even if you're right."

  She reached behind her neck, unclasped the pendant, and held it in her hand. She smiled but said forcefully "But so much of what Darwin and others call 'fact' is just untrue, or highly suspect. How can we add our documentary to the clamor of those congratulating him for being wrong? Haven't you always told me to seek and expose the truth?"

  Sam swallowed. "Yes. Maybe you're right. You're certainly right about African-Americans and women. But if you kick over the foundation of evolution to explain where we all really came from, then what is there?"

  "I don't know. That's what I want to ask."

  "I'll tell you. It'll be God. All of the Godsquaders will pounce on this and use it to try to tell the rest of us how to live. Do you want that?"

  "I don't know. I'm not a Godsquader. I just want the truth." "Well, whatever you want, you'll get God. And I'd rather believe in evolution than God. Evolution doesn't tell you what to do."

  "Even if it's wrong? If you're believing in a lie?" "It's worked for all these years."

  "Has it? You call what we've got today-working?"

  Sam came around his chair and leaned toward Pamela with both hands on his desk. "Listen, Pamela. The bottom line is that you, I and PTS aren't going to rock this boat. Everyone believes that Darwin was a great man and that his theories are fact. So we'll just give everyone what they want in a spectacular, visually stimulating documentary on the great man's life, and call it a day. Okay? It's easier. And we won't get in trouble."

  "Since when was our goal not to get in trouble? I thought our goal was truth in reporting."

  "In this case, our goal is not to get in trouble. We'd never win. There are too many on the other side. And if we won, we'd just be helping the God people. It's too scary a thought."

  "That's it?"

  "That's it."

  "Sam, I thought ..."

  The boss raised his hand. "Pamela, that's it."

  Lie #1: Evolution is a fact.

  Truth: Both Evolution (Macroevolution /Speciation) and Intelligent Design are theories which must be accepted or rejected on the best available evidence, and on faith.

  http://www.reasons.org

  http://www.icr.org/home/resources/resources_tracts_scientificcaseagainstevolution/

  http://www.discovery.org/id/peer-review/

  http://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=9&article=1455

  http://www.reasons.org/explore/topic/evolution

  http://www.str.org

  http://www.metaxastalk.com/video/darwins-doubt-with-stephen-meyer/

  http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/

  http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-christian-mans-evolution/

  http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-intro-to-biology.html

  Isaiah 40

  Genesis 1-3

  Psalm 19: 1-3

  Acts 17: 24-28

  Hebrews 11: 3

  Colossians 1: 15-17

  Romans 1: 20

  John 18: 37

  Nagel, Thomas. Mind & Cosmos. Oxford University Press, 2012.

  Ross, Hugh and Rana, Fazale. Who Was Adam? Second Expanded Edition. Rtb Press, 2015.

  Pernoff, James. Tornado in a Junkyard: The Relentless Myth of Darwinism. Refuge Books, 1999.

  Audio Book. Dissecting Evolution. Hugh Ross, Fazale Rana, Kenneth Samples.

  For the latest updates go to parkerhudson.com/blog. There are also posts on Evolution at this link and, with a little humor, at this link. Please enjoy the Archives by Category and Tags.

  Notes:

  2

  History

  Harrison Gillies sat alone in the teacher's lounge of the prestigious public high school grading English essays. Paintings donated by the Art Department, an oriental rug, and a couple of decades' accumulation of furniture lifted the room beyond its institutional beginnings. Gillies, nearing retirement, was slightly overweight. In an earlier era, he would have been smoking a pipe. From his comfortable chair by the window, he glanced at the clock, expecting the door to open any minute, as it did about this time on most Monday afternoons.

  The latch clicked and his younger colleague, Sandra Murphy, walked in carrying file folders and papers. She smiled and went to the counter by the sink to pour hot water. They enjoyed having tea together during their mutual free period.

  "Looks like we finally got them," she said, holding up the papers. "This ought to silence them once and for all."

  "Nice to see you, too." Gillies smiled. "When are you going to learn that in the South we say 'Hello' or 'How are you?' before launching into a declarative sentence?"

  She smiled, put the papers under her arm, and picked up the oversize mugs. He put the essays on a table next to his chair and took the warm mug she offered.

  She stood in front of his chair. "All right. Harrison, how are y'all?"

  "Fine, thank you. But just because I'm heavy doesn't mean I'm plural."

  "Sorry. I thought the term applied universally."

  "No, it's much more complex than the simple 'you'. You'll get the hang of it one day."

  She laughed. "Actually, when I call home it slips out sometimes. They're always aghast. And I like grits, too."

  "There's hope. But now that we've reminded you to 'whittle and spit' a little, what were you talking about when you came in?" He sipped his tea and motioned her to the sofa on the other side of the table.

  "Here, I brought you a copy." Murphy handed him three pages and sat on the sofa. Moving the pencil she was carrying to the table, she used both hands to pull back her light blond hair. "The Supreme Court just issued a ruling that should finally make things clear."

  Gillies adjusted his glasses. "Let me see." He read aloud.

  FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

  Washington, DC (AP). June 17, 2011. In a 5 to 4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that the Declaration of Independence, along with President Washington 's Inauguration and Farewell Addresses, may no longer be displayed or read in public schools.

  Citing the First Amendment, the court ruled that because there is a reference to God in each document, it is a violation of the Constitution’s prescribed separation of church and state to include the Declaration of Independence or Washington's speeches in public education.

  In addition, the display of the documents in government buildings and in other facilities supported with federal funds is also banned.

  Gillies lowered the press release into his lap and looked over at his colleague. "This is pretty strong."

  She eased back into the cushions on the sofa. "Yes, thank goodness."

  Each of them took a sip, and Gillies picked up the press release.

  Writing for the majority, Chief Justice Diane Timmons-Fulton ruled that "American school-- children will no longer be subjected to the narrow and bigoted view that the male imaged Judeo-Christian God, some other god, or any other religious construction was involved in the creation of our country."

  Speaking of George Washington and the other Founding Fathers, the Chief Justice wrote, "Either they were misguided at the time, or they did not foresee the implications of their personal beliefs on future generations. In either case, the court cannot allow words written over 200 years ago to improperly influence the citizens of our nation to believe in God, or in any other specific divine being."

  Federal, state and local governments will have one month to remove all copies of the documents from public buildings, and local school boards will have a year to acquire new history books that do not explic
itly quote the texts.

  "I suppose your History Department will be investing in new textbooks."

  "Yes, though the ones we've been using for years don't mention those speeches by Washington."

  He smiled and turned slightly in his chair. "Why are you so strident about this ruling?"

  "Harrison, come on! We've both been on the receiving end of those parents' e-mails and conferences where they want us to allow students to say anything about their faith here at school. If we did that, we'd have Christians berating Jews, Jews hating Muslims, and all of them ganging up on the atheists. The only safe way is to allow none of it. Keep all religions out of school. And clearly the Constitution requires it."

  Gillies frowned and took another sip of tea before reading the second page.

  In writing the minority dissent, Justice Wilton Thrower argued that "it would take many pages of single spaced entries just to list all of the public documents in which the Founding Fathers explicitly mentioned the Judeo-Christian God, His Son Jesus Christ, and their dependence on Him for guiding them through the ordeal of birthing this unique nation. Not only is this ban historically inaccurate, but it also strikes a blow to the one true Foundation of our country."

  Justice Thrower pointed out that the First Amendment was specifically written to prevent

  Congress from "establishing" a central religion for the nation, that it guarantees free expression on all religious issues, and that the term "Separation of Church and State" never appears in the Constitution or the Bill of Rights.

  "Denying our nation's dependence on God has become a gross distortion of the intent of the Founders. They always encouraged the influence of religious thought in public policy.

  "In addition, until the 1970s, generations of public school children grew up reading these two important speeches by our first and greatest President. In them Washington gives the formula for the continuing success, safety, and prosperity of our nation, the key element of which is an abiding belief in God and adherence to His commandments. "

  He looked up. "What do you think of that?"

  She shrugged. "It doesn't matter what I think. The Constitution creates a wall between church and state. Period."

  Her older mentor nodded. "Justice Thrower says it doesn't, and that the First Amendment is only talking about Congress establishing a state religion."

  "Well, if anyone talks about God in a public school, that's exactly what they're doing."

  "Is it? Are we Congress? We're a school."

  "How can you say that? You've complained about these religious fanatics as many times as I have."

  Gillies laughed and set the papers in his lap. "Yes. I know. But you're the historian. Isn't what President Washington said a matter of history?"

  "Yes, but it shouldn't be used to brainwash people today." "It's history."

  "And history shows us what happens when religion runs wild."

  "Are you saying that's what happened during the American Revolution?"

  She glared at him. "You know what I mean. We can't have religion at this school."

  "What if we did open up-let all the students say whatever they wanted? Instead of excluding all religions in the name of not offending anyone, what if we just let everyone speak their mind?"

  "We'd have chaos!"

  "But aren't we in the business of education? The interchange of ideas? Haven't you and I been on the frontlines of supporting diversity?"

  "Some students would be hurt. It wouldn't be right." "By words? Sandra, I teach English. If the school itself doesn't take sides, and insures that no one is unduly coercive, isn't that the kind of dialogue we want?"

  She shook her head. "Not about religion. Not with fundamentalist bigots."

  "Sounds like diversity-lite." He picked up the paper. "Let me finish it."

  People for Truth in Government, which Brought the original lawsuit, issued a statement foreseeing the same result in a similar suit to overturn the national motto, "In God We Trust," which is found on the nation 's currency. The statement also pointed out that one of Justice Thrower 's maternal ancestors owned slaves in South Carolina in the nineteenth century, and that both his uncle and grandfather were ministers, "so it is no surprise that Justice Thrower would be swayed on this issue. We are delighted that the majority instead held to truth and logic."

  Chief Justice Timmons-Fulton concluded her ruling by stating that "since the United States did not officially exist until the Constitution was ratified in 1788, any ex-officio meetings, writings or communications which may have occurred in the years prior to that date, including the 1776 gathering in Philadelphia to write the Declaration of Independence, cannot be given any official status, and so it is only proper that this group's narrow belief in God be stricken from the nation 's historic record and be accorded no particular significance.

  "In addition, while President Washington certainly helped establish the nation and governed reasonably well in its early years, it is precisely this lasting prestige which today makes it inappropriate for others to force his antiquated views about God on later generations. Unsuspecting schoolchildren might be encouraged to believe that God actually exists simply because George Washington apparently believed so. This would be a great tragedy."

  He put down the pages. "You're right. That's pretty clear."

  She tapped her finger on the mahogany coffee table in front of the sofa. "So the next time a parent, or even a student, complains that we don't allow the open expression of ideas on faith, religion, or whatever, we'll just give them a copy of this and tell them that we're following the law." She turned to face him. "And I know you agree with me. You must!"

  He leaned forward and looked down at the papers. "Yes, I suppose you're right."

  "Sometimes I think you ask me questions just to get me going, to practice your Socratic teaching method. But I know you."

  "I admit, I do like playing Devil's advocate. Forty years of teaching teenagers." He leaned back and looked out the window. "But there is something about this that bothers me." Gillies scratched his face, then wrapped his hands around the mug and held it in his lap. "When I was a graduate student at The University of London in the 70s, a Soviet student lived in my dorm. He was one of the few allowed to study abroad in those days. He was a little older than me, and much smarter. Over several months we became friends."

  He paused, his mind obviously on the past.

  "I don't know how it came up. Maybe an anniversary of World War II. Anyway, he didn't believe that his country had invaded Poland a few weeks following Germany in 1939."

  "The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. Hitler and Stalin divided Poland on paper in August, and invaded in September. And then Stalin took the Baltic states for good measure as well."

  He nodded and looked her way. "A-plus, historian. But, you see, Sergey had no knowledge of it. In fact, he got angry with me for even suggesting that his country could do something so despicable as to invade a peaceful neighbor. He was absolutely sure I was wrong."

  She shrugged her shoulders. "But you were right. Facts are facts."

  "Not to Sergey. He only knew the facts that Stalin had rewritten. The government didn't want its people to know the real facts-for the greater good of 'socialist reality.' In just one generation, Stalin's rewrite won, and the truth was lost to all but a handful of people."

  Sandra was silent. "But surely you don't equate what Stalin did to this?"

  He smiled. "Stalin wasn't as eloquent."

  "Come on." She dismissed his words with a wave of her hand.

  He sat up and turned all the way to face her. "No, I'm serious. You and I might agree with the outcome for now. But our own government has just ruled that the real truth can no longer be taught. In a generation, it, too, will be gone and forgotten. I can imagine some young American in London in twenty years arguing that President Washington could never have believed in God. That it would be impossible because Washington never mentioned God in his writing or his speeches."

  "Harri
son, come on. That could never happen here."

  "Why?" He held her eyes. "Because this is America."

  Lie #2: The Founding Fathers did not acknowledge God's important role in the founding of this nation.

  Truth: The majority of the Founding Fathers were Christians or Deists who believed in God and actively gave Him credit for acting in their daily lives and for founding this nation. They based America's laws on Biblical laws, quoted scripture in their writings and debates, and fully expected the nation to maintain its Christian heritage so that morality and ethics would make the rule of law possible.

  http://www.wallbuilders.com

  http://patriotpost.us/documents

  http://www.americanvision.org

  http://www.str.org/articles/america-s-unchristian-beginnings#.Vga-jdJViko

  Psalm 33:12

  Proverbs 14:34

  Jeremiah 18:7-10

  Isaiah 33:22

  Barton, David. Original Intent: The Courts, the Constitution, & Religion. Fifth Edition. WallBuilder Press, 2008.